Renault Kadjar 2018 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 90 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the BMW X1, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 33 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`994 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
BMW X1 has
| |