Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Audi Q3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 34 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kadjar consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is smaller, but higher. Renault Kadjar is 1 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 530 litres | |
| Renault Kadjar has 58 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 948 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`994 kg | 2`155 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`547 kg | 1`580 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 575 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Audi Q3. Therefore, Audi Q3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 30 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |