Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 472 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 78 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 399 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`035 kg | 2`295 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`598 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 437 kg | 595 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |