Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 58 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 30 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |