Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Opel Mokka 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.8 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kadjar consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kadjar could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Renault Kadjar has 4x4: Kadjar has an automatic four-wheel drive system with three modes: 2WD, AUTO and LOCK. In 2WD and AUTO modes, it`s a front-wheel drive vehicle under normal conditions. In AUTO mode, if wheel spin is detected, up to 50% of torque can be sent to the rear wheels. In LOCK mode, the center differential is engaged to provide a preset 50/50 power distribution between the front and rear axles. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 34 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1105 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 122 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 373 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`139 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`692 kg | 1`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 530 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Opel Mokka is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |