Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Renault Kadjar consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`946 kg | 2`123 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`415 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 531 kg | 583 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Renault Scenic. Therefore, Renault Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |