Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Mercedes GLA 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLA is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 47 HP less power than Mercedes GLA, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes GLA. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLA might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine Mercedes GLA 2017 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 3 cm longer than the Mercedes GLA, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 421 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLA, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`946 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Mercedes GLA has
| |