Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 15 HP more power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kadjar consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kadjar consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger, but lower. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 119 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`946 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 460 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |