Renault Kadjar 2015 vs BMW X1 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 47 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kadjar consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kadjar consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1390 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.55 m | |
| Renault Kadjar and BMW X1 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 52 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`946 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 270 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
BMW X1 has
| |