Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Volvo XC40 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC40 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo XC40. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| 1090 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC40, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
| Renault Kadjar has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC40, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`943 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC40 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |