Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Subaru XV 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Subaru XV is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 40 HP less power than Subaru XV, but torque is 64 NM more than Subaru XV. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| 1090 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Used also on Subaru Forester | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru XV, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 87 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. The Subaru XV may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.9 metres less than that of the Subaru XV, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`943 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Subaru XV has
| |