Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Subaru XV 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru XV is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 40 HP less power than Subaru XV, but torque is 64 NM more than Subaru XV. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 1090 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
| Renault Kadjar and Subaru XV are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1270 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 92 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.1 metres more than that of the Subaru XV. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`943 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru XV scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Subaru XV has
| |