Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Patriot is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 30 HP less power than Jeep Patriot, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jeep Patriot. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Journey, Dodge Caliber | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Patriot engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Patriot, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1777 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 299 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`943 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |