Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2016

 
Renault Kadjar
2015 - 2018
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP120 HP
Torque: 260 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds12.4 seconds
Renault Kadjar engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Kuga. Despite less power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data4.8
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.52 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.69 m
Renault Kadjar is smaller.
Renault Kadjar is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 472 litres456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1478 litres1603 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 16 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 125 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9432`100
Safety:
Ford Kuga is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
above average

low
Renault Kadjar has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 80016 000
Pros and Cons: Renault Kadjar has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv