Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Ateca, but torque is 10 NM more than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kadjar consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kadjar consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 11 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 38 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`916 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |