Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Dacia Duster 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar and Dacia Duster have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kadjar consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kadjar consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1570 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger, but lower. Renault Kadjar is 11 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 27 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.6 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Renault Kadjar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`916 | 1`819 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kadjar scores higher in safety tests, but Dacia Duster is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kadjar scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |