Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 337 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 399 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`903 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |