Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Subaru XV 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 20 HP less power than Subaru XV, but torque is 9 NM more than Subaru XV. Despite less power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kadjar consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV, which means that by driving the Renault Kadjar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kadjar consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru XV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru XV can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Used also on Subaru Forester | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru XV, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 87 litres more trunk space than the Subaru XV. The Subaru XV may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.9 metres less than that of the Subaru XV, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`853 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru XV scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Subaru XV has
| |