Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Opel Grandland 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Grandland is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 159 HP | 120 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 6.1 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.0 - 7.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar is 1 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1652 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Grandland, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`970 kg | ~ 2`062 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`524 kg | ~ 1`455 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 446 kg | ~ 607 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than Opel Grandland. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |