Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.7 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 159 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 78 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 504 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`970 | ~ 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |