Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.7 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 159 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.8 | 4.9 - 6.8 | |
|
Renault Kadjar petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Renault Kadjar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 399 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`970 kg | ~ 2`284 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`524 kg | ~ 1`671 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 446 kg | ~ 613 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |