Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.7 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 159 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1598 litres | |
| Renault Kadjar has 42 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`970 | ~ 1`953 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |