Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Renault Kadjar is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar F-Pace is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Renault Kadjar is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar F-Pace can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Renault Kadjar also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Jaguar F-Pace is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 159 HP | 163 - 550 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 340 NM | 365 - 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 4 - 9.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 793 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1842 litres | |
Jaguar F-Pace has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 321 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar F-Pace (by 364 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`970 | ~ 2`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 39 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |