Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Kadjar is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 130 HP | 86 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 320 NM | 160 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | 8.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.6 | 3.6 - 5.5 | |
|
Renault Kadjar petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. On average, Renault Kadjar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Kadjar has 28 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`935 | ~ 1`896 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |