Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Renault Scenic 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Kadjar is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Scenic can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 130 HP | 95 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 320 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | 9.1 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.6 | 3.9 - 6.0 | |
|
Renault Kadjar petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Renault Kadjar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 4 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`935 kg | ~ 2`071 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`409 kg | ~ 1`534 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 526 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |