Renault Kadjar 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 130 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 - 320 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Kuga are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Kadjar. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.6 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Renault Kadjar petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Renault Kadjar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1653 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`935 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`409 kg | ~ 1`670 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 526 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |