Renault Grand Scenic 2017 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2017 - 2018
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP150 HP
Torque: 260 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds10.7 seconds
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.67.2
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1140 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.85 m
Width: 1.87 m1.90 m
Height: 1.66 m1.74 m
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller.
Renault Grand Scenic is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 718 litres809 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1901 litresno data
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space.
Renault Grand Scenic has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0842`290
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 13 00014 000
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv