Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 70 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Renault Grand Scenic 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 8 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 189 litres | 809 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 189 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 809 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`241 | 2`290 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 14 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |