Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Volkswagen Touran 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 117 mm (4.6 inches) | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Touran can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Touran version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 718 litres | 834 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1980 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Grand Scenic has 116 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Renault Grand Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |