Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.3 | |
| Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 21 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 189 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 189 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 537 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`217 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |