Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.2 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 718 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Renault Grand Scenic has 91 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`144 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |