Renault Grand Scenic 2016 vs Opel Combo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 55 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | Used also on Fiat Bravo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Grand Scenic is 24 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1737 litres | 3200 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 1463 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Opel Combo has
| |