Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 21 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.4 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
| |