Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Renault Grand Espace is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 29 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Renault Grand Espace. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.5 | |
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 83 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Renault Grand Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Grand Scenic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Grand Scenic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Renault Grand Espace 2003 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.75 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 37 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Espace, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 11 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 456 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | 456 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | 3050 litres | |
In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 57 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Espace (by 1035 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`555 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |