Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |