Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Mazda 5 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic and Mazda 5 have the same engine power, but Renault Grand Scenic torque is 13 NM less than Mazda 5. Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2004 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | 1678 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda 5 has more luggage space (by 25 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 337 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |