Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite the higher power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |