Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 15 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.76 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 1.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |