Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Renault Grand Espace. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.0 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Grand Scenic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Grand Scenic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 37 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Espace, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | 3050 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 57 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Espace (by 1035 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |