Renault Grand Scenic 2004 vs Mazda 5 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 513 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2015 litres | 1566 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Renault Grand Scenic has more luggage space (by 401 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |