Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 22 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.0 | |
| Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1960 litres | 1734 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`205 kg | 2`040 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`535 kg | 1`511 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 670 kg | 529 kg | |
| Renault Grand Scenic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Therefore, Renault Grand Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
| |