Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Toyota Corolla Verso. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.5 | |
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Grand Scenic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Grand Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 14 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 423 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 423 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1960 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 1.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`035 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |