Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |