Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2006 - 2009
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP115 HP
Torque: 300 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds13.7 seconds
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.3
Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1340 km on highway
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.64 m1.73 m
Renault Grand Scenic is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 533 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 533 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1960 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1952`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 20002200
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv