Renault Grand Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, but torque is 30 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.1 | |
| Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 533 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 533 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |