Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2009 - 2012
Volkswagen Sharan
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 160 HP140 HP
Torque: 380 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds12.8 seconds
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.2
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.63 m
Width: 1.85 m1.81 m
Height: 1.65 m1.73 m
Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 208 litres256 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 208 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data256 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2063 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2512`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 40002600
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv