Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is smaller. Renault Grand Scenic is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`251 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |