Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 76 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.5 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Grand Scenic could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger. Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`251 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |