Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.4 | |
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`128 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |