Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Renault Grand Scenic
2009 - 2012
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP115 HP
Torque: 195 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds17.2 seconds
Renault Grand Scenic is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.710.4
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Grand Scenic consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway860 km on highway
Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.63 m
Width: 1.85 m1.81 m
Height: 1.65 m1.73 m
Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 208 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 208 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2063 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1281`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 40002800
Pros and Cons: Renault Grand Scenic has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv