Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.3 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Grand Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Grand Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2063 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Renault Grand Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |