Renault Grand Scenic 2009 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Renault Grand Scenic engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Renault Grand Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| Renault Grand Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Grand Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Suzuki Grand Vitara | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Grand Scenic is 9 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 208 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2063 litres | 1734 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 329 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`610 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 520 kg | |
| Renault Grand Scenic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Therefore, Renault Grand Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |